Batman #23.1 (The Joker #1) Review: Joker Tries Parenting

This review contains spoilers

To kick off “Villains Month” for the Batman ongoing, Andy Kubert (Who is mainly known as an artist) steps up to the plate to write this week’s Batman #23.1—a one-shot focusing on Joker, or rather his Ape companion Jackanapes. Kubert co-created Jackanapes with Grant Morrison back in Batman #666Andy Clarke who you may remember from the backups in Batman #12 and Batman #0 provides the art for this issue.

joker1

THE GOOD

This is a pretty good side story. It doesn’t exactly fit in anywhere in the current timeline, but it serves its purpose as a fun side story. The origins of The Joker have always been a gray zone and he is currently missing after the events of Death of the Family so it only other option is for this story to take place at an earlier point.

The story starts out on a fairly dark note, and maintains a mostly sinister tone throughout; there are some lighter moments spliced in.

Andy Clarke is a perfect artist for a book like this. He draws a very Brian Bolland-esque Joker and highlights all the creepy and silly moments in the book. As far as I know this is one of Andy Kubert’s first writing credits along with Damian: Son of Batman coming this fall, fitting seeing he has drawn both Jackanapes and Damian’s first appearances. I suppose Grant Morrison wasn’t available to write this issue, but Kubert was the next best choice.

joker2

THE BAD

This issue is a pointless addition to “Villains Month.” Joker is a primary villain of the DCU and leaving him out would be stupid. If they couldn’t do an origin story (Deadshot #1, Count Vertigo #1, Relic #1) or a tie-in to Forever Evil (Two-Face #1, Deadshot #1) what’s the point?

At the end of the story says the story will be potentially continued in a future Batman book. How? which one? All the batbooks seem to be on a straight course for the next couple of months. Maybe we might see The Joker return as hinted in Forever Evil. As it stands right now this book doesn’t serve much purpose.

Despite doing a good job writing, I would rather see Andy Kubert draw.

THE VERDICT:Rating3(3/5)

Sadly, Batman #23.1 is the book to skip this week. It features a decent story, but has no business being a part of “Villains Month.” Definitely skip this book if you only plan on reading “Forever Evil” tie-ins or origin stories.

joker3
O_O

Batman #23.1 is written by Andy Kubert with art by Andy Clarke. It is available in Print or Digitally for $2.99 USD, or with a 3D cover for $3.99 USD

Z

Z

Z is pretty much a guy who fancies himself some comics. Batman, Green Lantern, Superman, it dosen't matter. We don't know much about Z, but he seems like a cool guy.
  • collide8

    Did you review the comic… or did you review the comic conjoining with the month of its theme…? I’m not really in disagreement or agreement with you, but your review is adding in outside sources to the comic. While its good to use as a reference, it should stop there, a reference. Not a guideline to review and score a comic.

    • MyNameIsZ

      I think when reviewing a villains month book there are certain guidelines. All the other books seem to be on track whether it’s an origin or a Forever Evil tie-in. This book is just out to lunch and seems only right to make reference to what this is. Its Andy Kubert pretty much showing everyone that Batman #666 was a thing. It’s a book from 2007 and a storyline is not exactly relevant anymore (at least to the main continuity). The fact this is a continuation or prequel to a previous story really should affect this review, because its not like it has anything to do with what is going on right now in the DCU. Darkseid, and Zod both tie into the Batman/Superman book, Deadshot, Harley Quinn, Black Manta, Killer Frost, Court of The Owls, and Two-Face are all relevant to the current happenings in Forever Evil, so on and so forth, If the connection between the two books in inconsistent that should be a big critique of the book. Black Manta is speaking with Amanda Waller in FE #1 and in BM #1 it continues from there expanding the story and rewarding us for reading this tie-in. BM #1’s score then should reflect the consistency. Joker #1 has none of this it has nothing to do with villains month or Forever Evil and in my books that dropped the score from a 4/5 to a 5/5.